Allahabad High Court
SUNNY AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
Petitioners Sunny and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. The petition sought relief (the specific relief is not detailed in the record). During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel announced that they no longer wished to pursue the writ and requested its withdrawal. The State's Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, noting the petitioners' clear intention to withdraw and the lack of any objection, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition can be dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioners' request and without objection from the respondents
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- high court
- criminal miscellaneous
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18392 of 2026
Sunny And 3 Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Atmaram Nadiwal, Dinesh Kumar
Yadav
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 47
HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the
State and perused the record.
2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners has
made a statement at the Bar that he does not want to press this
writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.
3. Learned AGA for the State has no objection to the aforesaid
prayer.
4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
September 18, 2026
Nadim
(Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
NADIM ALAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…