Allahabad High Court
BUNTY @ BALLUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
Bunty @ Ballu filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18399 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging an action of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel, Rajesh Kumar Pal, informed the court that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the writ and seeks to withdraw it. The State’s Additional Government Advocate (AGA) raised no objection to the withdrawal. The court, after noting the petitioner’s clear intention to withdraw and the lack of opposition, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. Consequently, the petition was closed without any substantive adjudication on the merits.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition can be withdrawn by the petitioner after filing and after the commencement of proceedings
Subjects
- withdrawal of writ petition
- procedural law
- criminal miscellaneous writ
- high court jurisdiction
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18399 of 2026
Bunty @ Ballu
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Kumar Pal
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 47
HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the
State and perused the record.
2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has
made a statement at the Bar that he does not want to press this
writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.
3. Learned AGA for the State has no objection to the aforesaid
prayer.
4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
September 18, 2026
Nadim
(Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
NADIM ALAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…