Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

TUKTUK @ YUVRAJ MINORversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Tuktuk @ Yuvraj Minor filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the writ and seeks to withdraw it. The State's Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to the withdrawal. The court, noting the clear intention of the petitioner to discontinue the proceedings and the lack of any opposition, dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • The petitioner's request to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous writ petition

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • criminal miscellaneous writ
  • procedural law
  • high court

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                              CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18406 of 2026

                                    Tuktuk @ Yuvraj Minor
                                                                                            .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                    Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                           .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                 :   Pankaj Kumar Govil
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                 :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the
                                    State and perused the record.

                                    2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has
                                    made a statement at the Bar that he does not want to press this
                                    writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned AGA for the State has no objection to the aforesaid
                                    prayer.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.
                                    September 18, 2026
                                    Nadim

                                                                (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
NADIM ALAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.