Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ADITYA JAISWAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioners Aditya Jaiswal and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners announced that they no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The Attorney General for the State of Uttar Pradesh raised no objection to this request. The Court, after noting the withdrawal request and the lack of opposition, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be dismissed on the ground of voluntary withdrawal by the petitioners.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • dismissal
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • high court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18464 of 2026

                                    Aditya Jaiswal And Another
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                             .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)               :   Ashwani Kumar Pathak
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)               :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                      HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                      HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the State
                                    and perused the record.

                                    2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners has made a
                                    statement at the Bar that he does not intend to press this petition and
                                    seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned AGA has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the above statement, the instant writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    September 18, 2026
                                    KU

                                                                     (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.