Allahabad High Court
RAVI KASHYAP AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed due to the absence of any party or counsel appearing before the court.
Summary
The petitioners sought relief in a criminal miscellaneous writ petition, but mediation between the parties had failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either side to argue the petition. The court noted the absence of representation and consequently dismissed the petition. The dismissal was based on procedural grounds rather than substantive merits. No further orders were made.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when a petition is filed without any counsel appearing to argue it?
Subjects
- mediation failure
- petition dismissal
- procedural default
- court appearance
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18500 of 2025
Ravi Kashyap And 5 Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Awadhesh Singh, Parvat Singh
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Vivek Kumar Yadav
Court No. - 44
HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J.
1. It appears that mediation has failed between the parties.
2. None appears on behalf of the either of the parties to press this petition.
3. Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
(Satya Veer Singh,J.) (Siddharth,J.)
April 20, 2026
Ruchi Agrahari
Digitally signed by :-
RUCHI AGRAHARI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…