Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT SUBIA YUNUSversusSTATE OF UP AND 5 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Smt Subia Yunus, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 18511 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a final report favored the petitioner. The petitioner’s counsel, while not disputing this, expressed a desire to withdraw the writ petition. The respondent’s counsel raised no objection to the withdrawal. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition can be withdrawn after the investigation has concluded and a final report is filed

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • High Court
  • procedure

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18511 of 2026

                                    Smt Subia Yunus
                                                                                          .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                    Versus

                                    State Of Up And 5 Others
                                                                                         .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)       :    Brahma Kumar Tiwari, Sachin
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)       :    G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the
                                    State and perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. has pointed out that in the
                                    instant case, the investigation has already been concluded and a
                                    final report has been forwarded in favour of the petitioner.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the
                                    aforesaid fact but states that he does not want to press this writ
                                    petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    4. Learned AGA has no objection.

                                    5. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    September 21, 2026
                                    S. Singh

                                                                (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SAVITA SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.