Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

VAISHNAVI AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The Court held that until cognizance of the charge sheet is taken, the petitioners cannot be arrested.

Summary

Vaishnavi and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking protection from arrest. The State had already filed a charge sheet, but it was uncertain whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court observed that an interim order was operating in the petition and directed that the petitioners shall not be arrested until cognizance is formally taken by the concerned court. The Court therefore disposed of the writ petition, maintaining the interim protection. The order was signed by the judges on 20 April 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court can direct that petitioners not be arrested pending cognizance of a charge sheet
  • Whether the existence of an interim order suffices to stay arrest in a criminal writ petition

Subjects

  • cognizance
  • charge sheet
  • arrest
  • writ petition
  • interim order
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                                                   HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                   CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18544 of 2024

                                    Vaishnavi And Another
                                                                                                 .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus

                                    State Of Up And 3 Others
                                                                                               .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)         : Vikram Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)         : Anita Singh, G.A., Prem Babu Verma

                                    Court No. - 44
                                                         HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
                                                         HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J.

                                    1. Case called out in revised list.

                                    2. Learned A.G.A. appearing for State-respondents informs that charge
                                    sheet has already been filed in this case by the investigating officer, but he
                                    is not certain whether cognizance has been taken by the court thereon or
                                    not.

                                    3. Since charge sheet has already been submitted, but the correct position
                                    regarding the cognizance thereon is not clear, keeping in view the fact
                                    there is interim order operating in this writ petition, the same is disposed
                                    of directing that till the cognizance is taken on the police report by the
                                    court concerned, the petitioner/petitioners shall not be arrested.

                                    4. The writ petition stands disposed of.




                                                                           (Satya Veer Singh,J.) (Siddharth,J.)
                                    April 20, 2026
                                    Atul K. Sri.




Digitally signed by :-
ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.