Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

AJAY SHARMA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The High Court held that until cognizance is taken on the police report, the petitioners shall not be arrested.

Summary

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking relief from arrest, but did not appear before the court. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed, yet it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court noted the existence of an interim order in the writ petition and, to prevent premature detention, directed that the petitioners could not be arrested until cognizance is formally taken by the concerned court. The court emphasized that the procedural step of taking cognizance must precede any arrest in a criminal case. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of after issuing the non‑arrest direction. The decision underscores the importance of adhering to procedural safeguards before depriving liberty.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioners can be arrested before the trial court takes cognizance of the charge sheet
  • Whether the High Court can issue an interim direction restraining arrest pending cognizance

Subjects

  • cognizance
  • charge sheet
  • arrest
  • interim order
  • writ petition
  • criminal procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                                                     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                     CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18552 of 2025

                                    Ajay Sharma And 2 Others
                                                                                                   .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                                 .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                      :   Nidhi, Sushil Shukla
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                      :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 44
                                                           HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
                                                           HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J.

                                    1. Case is called out. No one appears on behalf of the petitioners.

                                    2. Learned A.G.A. appearing for State-respondents informs that charge
                                    sheet has already been filed in this case by the investigating officer, but he
                                    is not certain whether cognizance has been taken by the court thereon or
                                    not.

                                    3. Since charge sheet has already been submitted, but the correct position
                                    regarding the cognizance thereon is not clear, keeping in view the fact
                                    there is interim order operating in this writ petition, the same is disposed
                                    of directing that till the cognizance is taken on the police report by the
                                    court concerned, the petitioners shall not be arrested.

                                    4. The writ petition stands disposed of.



                                                                           (Satya Veer Singh,J.) (Siddharth,J.)
                                    April 20, 2026
                                    Ruchi Agrahari




Digitally signed by :-
RUCHI AGRAHARI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.