Allahabad High Court
DHARMVEER SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed as infructuous because of the lapse of time.
Summary
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 18568 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel, Ajay Kumar, was not present, and no interim relief had been granted. The court observed that a considerable lapse of time had occurred, rendering the petition ineffective. Consequently, the court held that the petition had become infructuous due to the efflux of time. The petition was therefore dismissed as infructuous.
Issues considered
- The petition can proceed despite the petitioner’s absence and the passage of time.
Subjects
- infructuous petition
- delay
- writ petition
- procedural default
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18568 of 2025
Dharmveer Singh
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 9 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 44
HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J.
1. Case is called out.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners is not present.
3. There was no interim order passed in this case.
4. The petition appears to have become infructuous by efflux of time.
5. It is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous.
(Satya Veer Singh,J.) (Siddharth,J.)
April 20, 2026
Ruchi Agrahari
Digitally signed by :-
RUCHI AGRAHARI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…