Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

MEENA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Meena Devi filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18568 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner, Surya Prakash Yadav, informed the Court that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the writ petition and seeks to withdraw it. The Additional Government Advocate for the State raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, after noting the petitioner's clear intention to withdraw and the lack of any objection, ordered the writ petition to be dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the petition stands closed without any substantive adjudication on the merits.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • high court procedure
  • civil procedure
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                 CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18568 of 2026

                                    Meena Devi
                                                                                            .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 10 Others
                                                                                            .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)         :   Surya Prakash Yadav
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)         :   A.S.G.I., Anurag Sharma, G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                       HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                       HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the
                                    State and perused the record.

                                    2. After some length of arguments, learned counsel for the
                                    petitioner has made a statement at the Bar that he does not intend
                                    to press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned A.G.A. for the State has no objection to the aforesaid
                                    prayer.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    September 28, 2026
                                    Ashutosh/S

                                                                  (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SAVITA SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.