Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

HARSHITA VASHISTHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Harshita Vashistha, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18573 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, stating that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the relief sought. The State's Additional Government Advocate (A.G.A.) raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, after noting the unopposed request, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition can be withdrawn by the petitioner after filing and without opposition from the respondent.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • criminal miscellaneous writ
  • procedural law
  • high court

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                 CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18573 of 2026

                                    Harshita Vashistha
                                                                                            .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                            .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)             :    Amit Kumar Srivastava
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)             :    G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                       HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                       HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the
                                    State and perused the record.

                                    2. After some length of arguments, learned counsel for the
                                    petitioner has made a statement at the Bar that he does not intend
                                    to press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned A.G.A. for the State has no objection to the aforesaid
                                    prayer.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    September 28, 2026
                                    Ashutosh/S

                                                                  (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SAVITA SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.