Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

UMMED SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The court held that until cognizance is taken on the police report, the petitioners shall not be arrested.

Summary

Petitioners Ummed Singh and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from arrest. The State, represented by the Attorney General, informed the court that a charge sheet had been filed but it was unclear whether the trial court had taken cognizance of the police report. The High Court, noting the existence of an interim order in the writ petition, directed that the petitioners could not be arrested until cognizance is formally taken by the concerned court. The court disposed of the writ petition on this basis. No further substantive orders were made.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioners can be arrested before the trial court takes cognizance of the charge sheet filed by the investigating officer
  • Whether the High Court can grant interim relief restraining arrest pending cognizance

Subjects

  • cognizance
  • charge sheet
  • writ petition
  • interim relief
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18621 of 2025

                                    Ummed Singh And 2 Others
                                                                                                 .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                               .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Ajay Mishra, Manish Singh, Nikhil
                                                                       Anand, Sarita Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 44
                                                       HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
                                                       HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J.

                                    1. Case called out in revised list.

                                    2. Learned A.G.A. appearing for State-respondents informs that charge
                                    sheet has already been filed in this case by the investigating officer, but he
                                    is not certain whether cognizance has been taken by the court thereon or
                                    not.

                                    3. Since charge sheet has already been submitted, but the correct position
                                    regarding the cognizance thereon is not clear, keeping in view the fact
                                    there is interim order operating in this writ petition, the same is disposed
                                    of directing that till the cognizance is taken on the police report by the
                                    court concerned, the petitioner/petitioners shall not be arrested.

                                    4. The writ petition stands disposed of.


                                                                           (Satya Veer Singh,J.) (Siddharth,J.)
                                    April 20, 2026
                                    sailesh




Digitally signed by :-
SAILESH PRAJAPATI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.