Allahabad High Court
ADITYA RAJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
Petitioner Aditya Raj filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that he no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The State's Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, after noting the petitioner's clear intention to withdraw and the lack of opposition, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were examined.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate procedure when a petitioner seeks to withdraw a writ petition before the High Court?
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- dismissal
- High Court
- criminal miscellaneous
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18621 of 2026
Aditya Raj
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dheeraj Maheshwari, Munna Lal
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 47
HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the
State and perused the record.
2. After some length of arguments, learned counsel for the
petitioner has made a statement at the Bar that he does not intend
to press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.
3. Learned A.G.A. for the State has no objection to the aforesaid
prayer.
4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
September 28, 2026
Ashutosh/S
(Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
SAVITA SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…