Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

FASIH AKHTAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioners Fasih Akhtar and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that they did not wish to pursue the present petition and sought to withdraw it, reserving the right to file a fresh petition with more detailed particulars. The respondents, including the State of U.P., raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, noting the petitioners' clear intention to withdraw, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn and granted liberty to file a new petition. The Court also ordered that certified copies of the relevant documents be returned to the petitioners' counsel as per procedural rules.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • writ petition
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • high court procedure

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                 CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18635 of 2026

                                    Fasih Akhtar And 4 Others
                                                                                           .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                          .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar, Bakhteyar Yusuf
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Mohd. Akbar Shah Alam Khan

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                       HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                       HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Learned counsel for the respondent no.4 has filed a short counter
                                    affidavit today in Court, which is taken on record.

                                    2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Mohd. Akbar Shah
                                    Alam Khan, learned counsel for the respondent no.4, learned AGA for
                                    the State and perused the record.

                                    3. After some length of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners
                                    has made a statement at the Bar that he does not intend to press the
                                    petition and seek to withdraw it with liberty to file afresh with better
                                    particulars.

                                    4. Learned AGA for the State and learned counsel for the respondent
                                    no.4 have no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    5. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

                                    6. Certified copy of the relevant documents be returned to the
                                    counsel for the petitioners as per Rules.

                                    September 28, 2026
                                    Ashutosh/S

                                                                  (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SAVITA SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.