Allahabad High Court
PREM SHANKAR SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition was dismissed as infructuous due to lapse of time.
Summary
Prem Shankar Sharma filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18660 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and six other respondents. The petitioner was to be represented by counsel Rahul Kumar Sharma, but he was not present on the hearing date. No interim relief had been sought or granted in the proceedings. The Court observed that the petition had become infructuous due to the passage of time. Consequently, the judges dismissed the petition as infructuous, without addressing any substantive merits.
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- delay
- dismissal
- High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18660 of 2025
Prem Shankar Sharma
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 6 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rahul Kumar Sharma
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Peeyush Kumar Pathak,
Prateeyush Kumar Pathak
Court No. - 44
HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J.
1. Case is called out.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not present.
3. There was no interim order passed in this case.
4. The petition appears to have infructuous by eflux of time, it, is
accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
(Satya Veer Singh,J.) (Siddharth,J.)
April 20, 2026
sailesh
Digitally signed by :-
SAILESH PRAJAPATI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…