Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

IMRAN @ BIHARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition was dismissed as infructuous because it was filed after the prescribed time.

Summary

The petitioner, Imran @ Bihari, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18671 of 2022 before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The petitioner's counsel was not present during the hearing. No interim order had been passed in the matter. The Court observed that the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as infructuous.

Subjects

  • petition dismissed
  • lapse of time
  • infructuous
  • criminal miscellaneous writ petition

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18671 of 2022

                                    Imran @ Bihari
                                                                                                     .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                                   .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)              :   Imaran Ahmad, Shams Uz Zaman
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)              :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 44
                                                             HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
                                                             HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J.

                                    1. Case is called out.

                                    2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not present.

                                    3. There was no interim order passed in this case.

                                    4. The petition appears to have infructuous by eflux of time, it, is
                                    accordingly dismissed as infructuous.

                                    April 20, 2026
                                    Kpy
                                                                               (Satya Veer Singh,J.) (Siddharth,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
KAVLESHWAR PRASAD YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.