Allahabad High Court
AJAY KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed as infructuous due to the lapse of time.
Summary
The petitioner, Ajay Kumar Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two others. No counsel appeared for the petitioner and no interim order was passed. The court observed that the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time. Consequently, the judges held that the petition could not be entertained further. The petition was therefore dismissed as infructuous.
Issues considered
- What is the effect of the lapse of time on the maintainability of a criminal miscellaneous writ petition?
Subjects
- writ petition
- criminal miscellaneous
- lapse of time
- infructuous
- dismissal
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18687 of 2025
Ajay Kumar Singh
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Shukla
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 44
HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J.
1. Case is called out.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not present.
3. There was no interim order passed in this case.
4. The petition appears to have infructuous by eflux of time, it, is
accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
(Satya Veer Singh,J.) (Siddharth,J.)
April 20, 2026
sailesh
Digitally signed by :-
SAILESH PRAJAPATI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…