Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SAILU AND 9 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The Court allowed the withdrawal of the writ petition and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that the investigation had been completed and a final report favorable to them had been submitted, and they wished to withdraw the petition. The State's Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, noting the parties' consent, permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition may be withdrawn after the investigation report has been filed and the parties consent?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • investigation report
  • High Court

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18701 of 2026

                                    Sailu And 9 Others
                                                                                         .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                    Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                        .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akash Singh, Anamika Singh, Bipin
                                                                Kumar, Shivam Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the
                                    State and perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has made
                                    a statement at the Bar that in the instant case, the investigation
                                    has already been concluded and a final report has been forwarded
                                    in favour of the petitioners and as such he does not want to press
                                    this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned AGA for the State has no objection to the aforesaid
                                    prayer.

                                    4. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    September 22, 2026
                                    S. Singh

                                                                 (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SAVITA SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.