Allahabad High Court
RAJENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed as infructuous due to the lapse of time.
Summary
Petitioner Rajendra filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 1879 of 2022 before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel was absent and no interim relief had been obtained. The Court observed that the petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time (eflux of time). Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition as infructuous. No further orders or directions were issued.
Issues considered
- Whether the petition is maintainable despite the lapse of time (eflux of time)?
Subjects
- petition dismissed
- infructuous
- lapse of time
- criminal miscellaneous writ
- Allahabad High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1879 of 2022
Rajendra
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajnish Dubey
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Rachna Dubey
Court No. - 44
HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J.
1. Case is called out.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not present.
3. There was no interim order passed in this case.
4. The petition appears to have infructuous by eflux of time, it, is
accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
April 20, 2026
Kpy
(Satya Veer Singh,J.) (Siddharth,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
KAVLESHWAR PRASAD YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…