Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

DIVYANSH MUDGAL @ AYUSH AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn, allowing the petitioners to withdraw the petition after the charge-sheet submission.

Summary

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 18823 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. After the charge-sheet was submitted in the underlying criminal case, the petitioners, through counsel, sought to withdraw the writ petition. The respondents opposed the withdrawal. The Court considered whether a writ petition can be withdrawn after the filing of a charge-sheet. It held that the petitioners were free to withdraw the writ, and there was no impediment to doing so. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition may be withdrawn after the charge-sheet has been filed

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • charge-sheet
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • high court

Judgment

                                                     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                     CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18823 of 2025

                                    Divyansh Mudgal @ Ayush And 5 Others
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)          : Deepak Dubey, Mool Chandra Maurya
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)          : Kamlendra Singh Jadaun, Amitabh
                                                                         Agarwal, G.A., Shekhar Gangal

                                    Court No. - 44
                                                           HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
                                                           HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J.

                                    Sri Mool Chandra Maurya, learned counsel for the petitioners states that
                                    charge-sheet has been submitted. Hence he wants to withdraw this writ
                                    petition.

                                    It is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                                           (Satya Veer Singh,J.) (Siddharth,J.)
                                    April 20, 2026
                                    Ruchi Agrahari




Digitally signed by :-
RUCHI AGRAHARI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.