Allahabad High Court
SHYAM TIWARI AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed as infructuous because it has become stale due to the passage of time.
Summary
Petitioners Shyam Tiwari and six others filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18842 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. Counsel for the petitioners, Prashant Shukla, was not present before the bench. No interim order had been passed in the proceedings. The court noted that the petition had become infructuous due to the passage of time. Consequently, the bench dismissed the petition as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether the petition can be entertained despite lapse of time rendering it infructuous
Subjects
- lapse of time
- infructuous petition
- writ petition
- dismissal
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18842 of 2025
Shyam Tiwari And 6 Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prashant Shukla
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Mukesh Kumar
Court No. - 44
HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J.
1. Case is called out.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners is not present.
3. There was no interim order passed in this case.
4. The petition appears to have infructuous by eflux of time, it, is
accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
(Satya Veer Singh,J.) (Siddharth,J.)
April 20, 2026
sailesh
Digitally signed by :-
SAILESH PRAJAPATI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…