Allahabad High Court
RUMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
Petitioners Ruma and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The second petitioner was subsequently arrested and the petitioners expressed their intention to withdraw the writ. The State and the fourth respondent did not object to the withdrawal. The Court, noting the petitioners' request and the lack of objection, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition can be withdrawn after filing when a petitioner is arrested
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- criminal miscellaneous
- High Court
- procedural
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18849 of 2026
Ruma And Another
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dileep Kumar Srivastava, Phool
Chandra
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Santosh Kumar Singh
Court No. - 47
HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the
State, Shri Vishal Kumar Sengar, Advocate holding brief of Shri
Santosh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.4
and perused the record.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has made
a statement at the Bar that petitioner no.2 has already been
arrested and, as such, he does not intend to press this writ petition
and seeks to withdraw it.
3. Learned AGA for the State and learned counsel for the
respondent no.4 have no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
September 9, 2026
Ashutosh/S
(Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
SAVITA SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…