Allahabad High Court
TINKAL AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed due to the absence of parties or their counsel to press the petition.
Summary
The petitioners, Tinkal and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. The parties attempted mediation, which ultimately failed. No counsel appeared on behalf of either side to argue the petition. The Court observed the lack of representation and the failure of mediation. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when a writ petition is pending and no counsel appears for either party after failed mediation?
Subjects
- mediation
- writ petition
- dismissal
- criminal miscellaneous
- High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18879 of 2025
Tinkal And 4 Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arpit Khanna, Swayamanand Sisodiya
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 44
HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J.
HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J.
1. It appears that mediation has failed between the parties.
2. None appears on behalf of the either of the parties to press this petition.
3. Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
(Satya Veer Singh,J.) (Siddharth,J.)
April 20, 2026
sailesh
Digitally signed by :-
SAILESH PRAJAPATI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…