Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

UMESH SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Umesh Sharma, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel announced that the investigation had been concluded with a final report favorable to the petitioner and expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The State’s Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, after noting the lack of objection, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. The dismissal effectively closed the proceedings without any substantive adjudication on the merits.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition can be withdrawn by the petitioner after filing
  • Whether the Court can dismiss the petition as withdrawn in the absence of any objection from the State

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • investigation report
  • High Court

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                              CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18881 of 2026

                                    Umesh Sharma
                                                                                        .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                    Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 4 Others
                                                                                       .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Tiwari, Jitendra
                                                                Kumar Maurya, Priyanka Kumari
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the
                                    State and perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a
                                    statement at the Bar that in the instant case, the investigation has
                                    already been concluded and a final report has been forwarded in
                                    favour of the petitioner and as such he does not intend to press
                                    this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    4. Learned AGA for the State has no objection to the aforesaid
                                    prayer.

                                    5. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    September 23, 2026
                                    Sanjeet

                                                                 (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SANJEET KUMAR YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.