Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RUBINA @ RUBYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Rubina @ Ruby filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Tariq Naiyer, informed the court that the petitioner had already been arrested and that she no longer wished to pursue the writ, seeking to withdraw it. The Additional Government Advocate for the State raised no objection to the withdrawal. The court, noting the petitioner's clear intention to discontinue the proceedings, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. The order was pronounced on 28 September 2026 by Judges Rajiv Gupta and Devendra Singh‑I.

Issues considered

  • Can a criminal miscellaneous writ petition be withdrawn after the petitioner has been arrested?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • high court
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 19228 of 2026

                                    Rubina @ Ruby
                                                                                               .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                             .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)             :    Tariq Naiyer, Zaya Firdaus
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)             :    G.A., Raman Pandey

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                      HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                      HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and
                                    perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, Sri Tariq Naiyer, learned counsel for the petitioner
                                    has made a statement at the Bar that petitioner in the instant case, has
                                    already been arrested by the police and as such, he does not intend to
                                    press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned AGA has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    September 28, 2026
                                    SFH

                                                                     (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SYED FAHIM HUSAIN
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.