Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SHRIMATI POOJA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Shrimati Pooja Devi filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 19247 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the State of U.P. and others. The investigation in the underlying matter had already been concluded and a charge sheet was filed on 17 May 2026. The petitioner later informed the Court that she did not wish to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. The learned Additional Government Advocate confirmed the status of the investigation, and the petitioner’s counsel could not dispute these facts. In view of the petitioner’s clear intention to withdraw, the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, without addressing any substantive issues.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when a petitioner seeks to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous writ petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • high court
  • dismissal

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 19247 of 2026

                                    Shrimati Pooja Devi
                                                                                                  .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 6 Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)             :   Prakash, Siddharth Srivastava
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)             :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                       HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                       HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and
                                    perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned AGA has pointed out that in the instant case,
                                    investigation has already been concluded and a charge sheet has been
                                    forwarded against the accused persons on 17.5.2026.

                                    3. Per contra, learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the
                                    aforesaid facts but states that she does not intend to press this writ petition
                                    and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    4. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    September 28, 2026
                                    SFH

                                                                       (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SYED FAHIM HUSAIN
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.