Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RAMFAL AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh petition.

Summary

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that they did not wish to pursue the present petition and sought to withdraw it, requesting liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars. The respondent's Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, accepting the petitioners' request, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn and granted liberty to file a fresh petition. The Court also ordered the return of the certified copies of the documents to the petitioners' counsel.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioners at the stage of hearing
  • Whether the petitioners may be granted liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars after withdrawal

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • writ petition
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • procedural law

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                           CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 19259 of 2026

                                    Ramfal And 7 Others
                                                                                                   .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus
                                    State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others
                                                                                                 .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Santosh     Kumar      Kesarwani,     Sudhir
                                                                       Kumar
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                       HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                       HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State and
                                    perused the record.

                                    2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners has made a
                                    statement at the Bar that he does not intend to press this petition and seeks to
                                    withdraw it with liberty to file fresh petition with better particulars.

                                    3. Learned AGA has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

                                    5. Certified copy of the relevant documents be returned to counsel for the
                                    petitioners as per Rules.

                                    September 28, 2026
                                    KU
                                                                       (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.