Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SURESH CHAUHAN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request and lack of objection.

Summary

Petitioners Suresh Chauhan and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners announced that they no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The respondent's counsel and the Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, noting the petitioner's clear intention to withdraw and the absence of any objection, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request and without objection from the respondents

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • high court
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • dismissal

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 19319 of 2026

                                    Suresh Chauhan And 2 Others
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)          :   Bihaan Pandey
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)          :   G.A., Shivam Kumar Modanwal

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                      HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                      HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for
                                    respondent no.4 and learned A.G.A.

                                    2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners has made a
                                    statement at the Bar that he does not want to press this writ petition and
                                    seeks to withdraw it.

                                    2. Learned AGA as well learned counsel for respondent no. 4 has no
                                    objection to the aforesaid prayer.


                                    3. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.




                                                                     (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
                                    September 8, 2026
                                    R




Digitally signed by :-
RAM ASARE MORYA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.