Allahabad High Court
MOHAMMAD RAFIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Mohammad Rafi, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 19462 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and three others. The petition was listed for hearing and a revised call was made, but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The learned Additional Government Advocate representing the State was present in court. The Court observed that the petitioner had not prosecuted the petition and consequently dismissed it. The interim orders, if any, that were earlier granted were vacated. The judgment was delivered by Hon'ble Justices Tarun Saxena and Chandra Dhari Singh on September 9, 2026.
Issues considered
- The petitioner's failure to appear and prosecute the writ petition
Subjects
- writ petition
- non prosecution
- dismissal
- criminal miscellaneous
- high court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 19462 of 2026
Mohammad Rafi
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pramod Bhardwaj
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
1. List revised.
2. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner even in revised call.
3. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.)
September 9, 2026
SK Srivastava
Digitally signed by :-
SAILESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…