Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RAMESH RAJPUT AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The Court granted leave to withdraw the writ petition and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioners Ramesh Rajput and two others filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 19468 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the petition, stating they would pursue an appropriate remedy elsewhere. The State's counsel, represented by Additional Government Advocate R.K. Gupta, raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, after considering the submissions, granted leave to withdraw the writ petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioners to seek other remedies.

Issues considered

  • Whether a party may be granted leave by the High Court to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous writ petition.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • criminal miscellaneous writ
  • procedural law
  • High Court
  • liberty to avail remedy

Judgment

                                                    HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                    CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 19468 of 2026

                                    Ramesh Rajput And 2 Others
                                                                                               .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                         Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                             .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                     :   Anil Kumar Bind
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                     :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                        HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
                                                        HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.

                                    1. Mr. Anil Kumar Bind, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
                                    petitioners, after some length of argument on merit, prayed for leave to
                                    withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy
                                    available under the law, as advised.

                                    2. Mr. R.K. Gupta, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing
                                    on behalf of the State-respondents has no objection on the prayer made by
                                    learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners for granting leave
                                    to withdraw the instant writ petition.

                                    3. Taking into consideration the submissions and prayer made by learned
                                    counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and no objection made by
                                    learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents, leave
                                    granted.

                                    4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with
                                    liberty, as prayed.



                                                                   (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.)
                                    September 9, 2026
                                    SK Srivastava




Digitally signed by :-
SAILESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.