Allahabad High Court
FAREED AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed because the FIR has already been lodged, leaving no matter for further adjudication.
Summary
The petitioner, Fareed Ahmad, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State and other respondents to comply with a July 17, 2026 order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate to register an FIR against certain individuals and to investigate the matter expeditiously. The State, represented by learned Additional Government Advocate S.K. Ojha, submitted that the FIR had already been lodged as per the magistrate’s order and that there was nothing further for the court to adjudicate. No counsel appeared for the petitioner. The Court examined the submissions and the record, noting that the FIR was indeed registered. Consequently, the Court found no basis to entertain the petition further. The writ petition was therefore dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether the High Court should issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to register and investigate the FIR as ordered by the Chief Judicial Magistrate
Subjects
- mandamus
- FIR registration
- criminal procedure
- writ petition
- High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 19911 of 2026
Fareed Ahmad
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 6 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rahul Shukla
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following
main reliefs:-
"(I). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of
mandamus directing the respondent nos. 2 & 3 to
comply the order dated 17.07.2026 passed by Chief
Judicial Magistrate, Gautam Buddha Nagar to register
the FIR against the respondent nos.4 to 7 and
investigate the matter against the respondent nos.4 to 7
expeditiously. "
2. Heard Mr. S.K. Ojha, learned AGA appearing on behalf of the
State and perused the material on record.
3. No one appears on behalf of petitioner.
4. It is submitted by learned AGA that the FIR has already been
lodged vide order dated 17.07.2026 passed by Chief Judicial
Magistrate, Gautam Buddha Nagar and also submits that nothing
has been left for further adjudication.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by
learned AGA and the fact that the impugned FIR has been
CRLP No. 19911 of 2026
2
lodged and the prayer made by the petitioner in the instant writ
petition, we do not find any good reason to keep this petition
pending for further adjudication.
6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is accordingly
dismissed.
September 21,
2026
C. MANI
(Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
CHANDRAMANI VERMA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…