Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RAJ BAHADUR ALIAS BAURA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioners' request and the respondent's consent.

Summary

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that they no longer wish to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The respondent's counsel, the Additional Government Advocate, raised no objection to the withdrawal. The court, noting the petitioners' clear intention to withdraw and the lack of any objection, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be withdrawn by the petitioners after filing and after hearing.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • high court
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • procedural law

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 19984 of 2026

                                    Raj Bahadur Alias Baura And 3 Others
                                                                                         .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                     Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                         .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                   :   Dileep Kumar
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                   :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                      HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                      HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the
                                    State and perused the record.

                                    2. After some length of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners
                                    has made a statement at the Bar that he does not want to press this
                                    writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    September 8, 2026
                                    S. Singh

                                                                  (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SAVITA SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.