Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ISHTEQARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Ishteqar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After filing, the petitioner informed the court that he had already been arrested and no longer wished to pursue the writ, seeking to withdraw it. The State's Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to the withdrawal. The court, noting the petitioner's clear intention to withdraw and the state's consent, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.

Issues considered

  • Can a petitioner withdraw a writ petition after filing it?
  • Does the consent of the State affect the withdrawal of a writ petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • high court
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • procedural law

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                 CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20021 of 2026

                                    Ishteqar
                                                                                            .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                          .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)              :   Akhilesh Kumar Tiwari
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)              :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                       HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                       HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State
                                    and perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a
                                    statement at the Bar that the petitioner has already been arrested and
                                    as such, he does not want to press this writ petition and seeks to
                                    withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned AGA for the State has no objection to the aforesaid
                                    prayer.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.




                                                                     (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
                                    September 8, 2026
                                    Ashutosh/S




Digitally signed by :-
SAVITA SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.