Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

MAYAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to approach the appropriate forum at a later stage.

Summary

The petitioner, Maya, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 20035 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging an ongoing criminal proceeding. The State of Uttar Pradesh had already concluded its investigation and filed a charge-sheet against the petitioner on 24 March 2026. While the petitioner did not dispute these facts, he expressed a desire to withdraw the writ petition and seek relief in the appropriate forum at a later stage. The learned Additional Government Advocate informed the court of the completed investigation and the filing of the charge-sheet. The court, after hearing the parties, accepted the petitioner's request and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting liberty to approach the appropriate forum later. No substantive merits of the criminal case were addressed, as the petition was withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate procedure when a petitioner seeks to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous writ petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • high court
  • charge-sheet

Judgment

                                                 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                 CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20035 of 2026

                                    Maya
                                                                                            .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    State Of Uttar Pradesh And 4 Others
                                                                                          .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)      : Devendra Kumar, Kapil Kumar Mishra
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)      : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                       HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                       HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State
                                    and perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned AGA for the State has pointed out that
                                    in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and
                                    charge-sheet has been forwarded against the petitioner on
                                    24.03.2026.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid
                                    facts but states that he does not want to press this writ petition and
                                    seeks to withdraw it with liberty to approach the appropriate forum at
                                    appropriate stage.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.



                                                                     (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
                                    September 8, 2026
                                    Ashutosh/S




Digitally signed by :-
SAVITA SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.