Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ABHIMANYU YADAV AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The Court allowed the withdrawal of the writ petition and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioners Abhimanyu Yadav and four others filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 20040 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought leave of the Court to withdraw the petition, requesting liberty to pursue any other appropriate remedy. The State, represented by the Attorney General, raised no objection to this request. The Court, after considering the application, granted leave to withdraw the petition. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn, with the petitioners free to seek other legal remedies.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition may be withdrawn with liberty to pursue other remedies under law

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • writ petition
  • procedural law
  • criminal miscellaneous writ

Judgment

                                                   HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                   CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20040 of 2026

                                    Abhimanyu Yadav And 4 Others
                                                                                              .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                            .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                      :   Ankush Yadav
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                      :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                       HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
                                                       HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.

                                    1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners, after some length
                                    of arguments, prayed for leave to withdraw the present petition with
                                    liberty to take appropriate remedy available under the law as advised.

                                    2. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State-respondents has no
                                    objection to the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the
                                    petitioners.

                                    3. Leave granted.

                                    4. The instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as
                                    prayed.



                                                                  (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.)
                                    September 9, 2026
                                    Prajapati RK




Digitally signed by :-
RAMKESH PRAJAPATI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.