Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ARVIND SAROJ AND 3 OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF U.P AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Arvind Saroj and three others filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 20144 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel announced that they do not wish to pursue the present writ petition and seek to withdraw it, while reserving the right to file a fresh petition with better particulars. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and the counsel for one of the respondents expressed no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, noting the petitioners' clear intention to withdraw, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn and granted liberty to file a fresh petition. The Court also ordered the return of any certified copies of documents to the petitioners' counsel as per the Rules.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • high court
  • criminal miscellaneous writ
  • procedural law

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                              CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20144 of 2026

                                    Arvind Saroj And 3 Others
                                                                                         .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                   Versus

                                    The State Of U.P And 3 Others
                                                                                         .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Girja Shanker Mishra, Pratiksha
                                                                Rai, Vinayak Varma
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s) : Abhishek Gupta, Akhilesh Kumar
                                                                Mishra, G.A., Sapna Prajapati, Syed
                                                                Mohammad Abbas Abdy

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the
                                    State, S.M.A. Abdy, learned counsel for the respondent no.4 and
                                    perused the record.

                                    2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners has
                                    made a statement at the Bar that he does not intend to press this
                                    writ petition and seeks to withdraw it with liberty to file fresh with
                                    better particulars.

                                    3. Learned AGA for the State as well as learned counsel for the
                                    respondent no.4 have no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.

                                    5. Certified copy of the relevant documents, if any, be returned
                                    back to learned counsel for the petitioners as per Rules.
                                    October 1, 2026
                                    Nadim

                                                                (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
NADIM ALAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.