Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SAGAR SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to approach the appropriate forum later.

Summary

Sagar Singh filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 20501 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The State informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge‑sheet against the petitioner had been filed on 13 August 2026. The petitioner did not contest these facts but expressed his desire to withdraw the writ petition, stating he would approach the appropriate forum later if needed. The Court considered the petitioner's request to withdraw the proceeding. Accordingly, the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner liberty to approach the appropriate forum at a later stage.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate procedure when a petitioner seeks to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous writ petition after a charge‑sheet has been filed?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • withdrawal
  • charge-sheet
  • High Court
  • procedural law

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                              CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20501 of 2026

                                    Sagar Singh
                                                                                        .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                   Versus

                                    State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others
                                                                                       .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar, Gyan Singh, Narendra
                                                                Kumar Bhadana
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Narendra Kumar Tiwari

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the
                                    State, Sri Rakesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Sri
                                    Narendra Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent no.2
                                    and perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned AGA for the State has pointed out
                                    that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded
                                    and a charge-sheet has been forwarded against the petitioner on
                                    13.08.2026.

                                    3. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the
                                    aforesaid facts but states that he does not intend to further press
                                    this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it with liberty to approach
                                    the appropriate forum at appropriate stage.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
                                    October 1, 2026
                                    Nadim

                                                                (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
NADIM ALAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.