Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

VEER PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request.

Summary

Veer Pal filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 20536 of 2026 in the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and two others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the Court that the petitioner had already been arrested by the police and no longer wished to pursue the petition, seeking its withdrawal. The respondent's Additional Government Advocate (AGA) raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court considered the petitioner's request and the lack of opposition. Accordingly, the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition can be withdrawn by the petitioner after his arrest

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • High Court
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20536 of 2026

                                    Veer Pal
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                             .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                  :   Ashish Kumar Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                  :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                      HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                      HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State
                                    and perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, Sri Susheel Kumar Singh holding brief of Sri Ashish
                                    Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at
                                    the Bar that the petitioner has already been arrested by the police and, as
                                    such, he does not intend to further press this petition and seeks to
                                    withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned AGA has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the above statement, the instant writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    October 1, 2026
                                    KU

                                                                     (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.