Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

DEVENDRA SINGH @ JAGGU YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn, allowing the petitioner liberty to approach the appropriate forum.

Summary

The petitioner, Devendra Singh @ Jaggu Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel stated that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the petition and seeks to withdraw it, requesting liberty to approach the appropriate forum. The State’s Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, noting the petitioner’s clear intention and the lack of opposition, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner liberty to approach another forum if desired.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner may withdraw a criminal miscellaneous writ petition at his discretion and have the petition dismissed as withdrawn

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • high court
  • procedural law
  • criminal miscellaneous

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                              CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20846 of 2026

                                    Devendra Singh @ Jaggu Yadav
                                                                                        .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                    Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 7 Others
                                                                                        .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd.        Imran,   Syed   Safdar    Ali
                                                                Kazmi
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the
                                    State and perused the record.

                                    2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has
                                    made a statement at the Bar that he does not intend to press this
                                    writ petition and seeks to withdraw it with liberty to approach the
                                    appropriate forum.

                                    3. Learned AGA for the State has no objection to the aforesaid
                                    prayer.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
                                    September 23, 2026
                                    Nadim

                                                                (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
NADIM ALAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.