Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

VIPIN @ VIPIN SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Vipin Sharma, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the writ and seeks to withdraw it. The respondent’s Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, noting the clear intention of the petitioner to discontinue the proceedings and the lack of any opposition, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Can a petitioner withdraw a criminal miscellaneous writ petition after filing it?
  • Is the court bound to dismiss the petition upon the petitioner's request when there is no objection from the respondent?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • high court
  • procedural law
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20847 of 2026

                                    Vipin @ Vipin Sharma
                                                                                         .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                     Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                        .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Himanshu Ranjan Shukla, Ramesh
                                                                Kumar Shukla, Sukrampal, Tikendra
                                                                Pratap Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                      HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                      HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the
                                    State and perused the record.

                                    2. After some length of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner
                                    has made a statement at the Bar that he does not want to press this
                                    writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    September 23, 2026
                                    S. Singh

                                                                  (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SAVITA SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.