Allahabad High Court
SATISH YADAV @ ANJNEY SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed.
Summary
Satish Yadav @ Anjney Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the continuation of an inquiry. The Commissioner of Police, Prayagraj, filed a personal affidavit and the investigating officer filed a compliance affidavit indicating that an inquiry had been set up against the responsible officer. The learned Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that the final investigation report had been forwarded to the concerned court on 09.09.2026. The petitioner, through counsel, prayed that the writ petition be disposed of in view of these statements. After hearing both sides and reviewing the affidavits, the Court found no reason to keep the matter pending and dismissed the writ petition.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed on the ground that the investigation report has been submitted and there is no substantive ground to continue the proceeding
Subjects
- writ petition
- criminal procedure
- affidavit
- investigation report
- dismissal
- High Court
- Allahabad
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20953 of 2026
Satish Yadav @ Anjney Singh
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pranesh Kumar Mishra
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE ABDUL SHAHID, J.
1. In pursuance of order dated 17.09.2026, the Commissioner of Police,
Prayagraj has filed his personal affidavit and the Investigating Officer
has filed his compliance affidavit before this Court, which are taken on
record.
2. We have perused the personal affidavit filed by the Commissioner of
Police, Prayagraj and satisfy with the contents made in the affidavit that
the inquiry has been set up against the responsible officer.
3. Learned A.G.A. for the State submitted and apprised the Court that
after completion of investigation final report has already been forwarded
on 09.09.2026 to the Court concerned. He has relied upon the contents of
paragraph no.3 of the compliance affidavit.
4. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted and
prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in the light of the
statement given by learned A.G.A. for the State and contents made in
paragraph no.3 of the compliance affidavit.
5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State
and perused the contents made in compliance affidavit and personal
affidavit on record.
6. Taking into consideration the statement given by learned A.G.A. and
contents made in paragraph no.3 of the compliance affidavit, we do not
CRLP No. 20953 of 2026
2
find any reason to keep the matter pending for further adjudication.
7. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.
(Abdul Shahid,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.)
September 30, 2026
Atul
Digitally signed by :-
ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…