Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SUNIL KUMAR VAIDHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The Court granted leave to withdraw the writ petition and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Sunil Kumar Vaidh filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 21223 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner’s counsel, Vinod Kumar, prayed for leave to withdraw the petition. The State of U.P. and other respondents, represented by Additional Government Advocate S.K. Ojha, raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, after considering the submissions, granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Court may grant leave to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous writ petition upon the petitioner's request and without objection from the respondents

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • criminal miscellaneous writ
  • procedural law
  • high court jurisdiction

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                           CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21223 of 2026

                                    Sunil Kumar Vaidh
                                                                                                  .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 4 Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                          :    Vinod Kumar
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                          :    G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                     HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
                                                     HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.

                                    1. Mr. Vinod Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
                                    prayed for leave to withdraw the present writ petition.

                                    2. Mr. S.K. Ojha, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing on
                                    behalf of the State-respondents has no objection on the prayer made by
                                    learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner for granting leave to
                                    withdraw the instant writ petition.

                                    3. Taking into consideration the submissions and prayer made by learned
                                    counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and no objection made by
                                    learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents, leave granted.

                                    4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

                                    September 14, 2026
                                    Shweta
                                                                 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SWETA YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.