Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ARVIND KUMAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The Court held that the petition may be withdrawn with liberty to avail any appropriate remedy before a competent court.

Summary

Petitioner Arvind Kumar Gupta filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 21358 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition, stating the petitioner would pursue any other appropriate remedy. The State, represented by the Additional Advocate General, raised no objection to the withdrawal request. The Court, after considering the application, granted leave to withdraw the petition. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of, with the petitioner being free to approach the appropriate court for any further relief.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner may be permitted to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous writ petition after filing.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • procedural law
  • criminal miscellaneous writ
  • high court order

Judgment

                                                   HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                   CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21358 of 2026

                                    Arvind Kumar Gupta
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                       :    Anurag Mishra
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                       :    G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                       HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
                                                       HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.

                                    1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner, after some length of
                                    arguments, prayed for leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty
                                    to take appropriate remedy available under the law as advised.

                                    2. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State-respondents has no
                                    objection to the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the
                                    petitioner.

                                    3. Leave granted.

                                    4. The instant writ petition is disposed of with liberty to avail appropriate
                                    remedy available under law before appropriate Court.



                                                                  (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.)
                                    September 8, 2026
                                    Prajapati RK




Digitally signed by :-
RAMKESH PRAJAPATI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.