Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RAHIS KHAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The Court granted leave to withdraw the writ petition and disposed of it, allowing the petitioners to seek appropriate remedy elsewhere.

Summary

Petitioners Rahis Khan and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners prayed for leave to withdraw the petition and to seek any other appropriate remedy. The State and other respondents, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate and counsel for respondent no.4, raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court granted leave to withdraw the petition. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed, with the petitioners being given liberty to approach the appropriate court for any further remedy.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner may be permitted to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous writ petition after filing.
  • Whether the High Court can grant leave for withdrawal of such a petition.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • criminal miscellaneous writ
  • procedural law
  • high court jurisdiction
  • petition disposal

Judgment

                                                   HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                   CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21365 of 2026

                                    Rahis Khan And Another
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                    :   Deepak Kumar Yadav
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                    :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 48
                                                       HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
                                                       HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.

                                    1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner, after some length of
                                    arguments, prayed for leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty
                                    to take appropriate remedy available under the law as advised.

                                    2. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gupta, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the
                                    State-respondents as well as Mr. Chandra Kumar Singh, learned counsel
                                    for the respondent no.4 have no objection to the innocuous prayer made
                                    by learned counsel for the petitioner.

                                    3. Leave granted.

                                    4. The instant writ petition is disposed of with liberty to avail appropriate
                                    remedy available under law before appropriate Court.



                                                                  (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.)
                                    September 8, 2026
                                    Prajapati RK




Digitally signed by :-
RAMKESH PRAJAPATI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.