Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

MAHAVEER SINGHversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Mahaveer Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. He informed the court that he had already been arrested and no longer wished to pursue the petition, seeking to withdraw it. The State, represented by its Additional Government Advocate, raised no objection to the withdrawal. The court, after noting the petitioner's statement and the State's consent, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.

Issues considered

  • Can a petitioner withdraw a criminal miscellaneous writ petition after being arrested?
  • Does the court require any formal procedure to dismiss a petition as withdrawn?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • high court
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                              CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21399 of 2026

                                    Mahaveer Singh
                                                                                        .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                    Versus

                                    The State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                       .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)            :   Kuldeep Singh Chahar
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)            :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the
                                    State and perused the record.

                                    2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a
                                    statement at the Bar that in the instant case, the petitioner has
                                    already been arrested, as such, he does not intend to further press
                                    this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned AGA for the State has no objection to the aforesaid
                                    prayer.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.
                                    September 30, 2026
                                    Nadim

                                                                 (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
NADIM ALAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.