Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

VIKAS AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Vikas and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order of the State of Uttar Pradesh. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that the petitioners no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, noting the clear intention of the petitioners to discontinue the proceedings, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition can be withdrawn by the petitioners after filing and without a formal order of the court

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • procedural law
  • criminal miscellaneous jurisdiction
  • high court

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                               CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21407 of 2026

                                    Vikas And 2 Others
                                                                                         .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                     Versus

                                    State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others
                                                                                         .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rahul Mishra, Rajesh Kumar Mishra
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                      HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                      HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the
                                    State and perused the record.

                                    2. After some length of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners
                                    has made a statement at the Bar that he does not want to press this
                                    writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    September 23, 2026
                                    S. Singh

                                                                  (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SAVITA SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.