Allahabad High Court
SUBHASH CHANDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request and the State's lack of objection.
Summary
The petitioner, Subhash Chandra, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The State's Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to this request. The Court, noting the petitioner's clear intention to withdraw and the lack of opposition, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. Consequently, the petition was closed without any substantive adjudication on the merits.
Issues considered
- What is the procedure for withdrawing a writ petition after it has been filed?
- Does the court require any further order or hearing to dismiss a petition that the petitioner wishes to withdraw?
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- procedural law
- criminal miscellaneous
- high court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21414 of 2026
Subhash Chandra
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jitendra Pratap Singh, Sunil
Vashisth
Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 47
HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the
State and perused the record.
2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has
made a statement at the Bar that he does not intend to press this
writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.
3. Learned AGA for the State has no objection to the aforesaid
prayer.
4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
September 30, 2026
Nadim
(Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
NADIM ALAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…