Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ASLAM QURAISHI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request and the respondent's lack of objection.

Summary

Petitioners Aslam Quraishi and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that they no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The State's Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to this request. The court, noting the petitioners' clear intention to withdraw and the lack of any objection, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate procedure when a petitioner seeks to withdraw a writ petition before the court?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • high court
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                              CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21424 of 2026

                                    Aslam Quraishi And Another
                                                                                        .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                    Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                       .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                 :   Shahrukh Khan
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                 :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                     HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the
                                    State and perused the record.

                                    2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners has
                                    made a statement at the Bar that he does not intend to press this
                                    writ petition and seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned AGA for the State has no objection to the aforesaid
                                    prayer.

                                    4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.
                                    September 30, 2026
                                    Nadim

                                                                (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
NADIM ALAM
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.