Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

TUSHAR SAINIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Tushar Saini filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner, Saurabh Basu, announced that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The Additional Government Advocate and counsel for one of the respondents did not oppose the withdrawal. The Court considered the petitioner's request and the lack of objection from the respondents. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, without addressing the merits of the underlying allegations.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner may withdraw a criminal miscellaneous writ petition after filing it
  • Whether the Court can dismiss the petition solely on the basis of the petitioner's request for withdrawal

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • criminal miscellaneous writ
  • high court procedure
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                           CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21448 of 2026

                                    Tushar Saini
                                                                                                   .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                          :    Saurabh Basu
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                          :    G.A., Vatsala

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                       HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                       HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State, Sri
                                    Vatsala, learned counsel for respondent No. 4 and perused the record.

                                    2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a
                                    statement at the Bar that he does not intend to further press this petition and
                                    seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned AGA as well as counsel for respondent No. 4 has no objection to
                                    the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the above statement, the instant writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    September 30, 2026
                                    KU
                                                                       (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.