Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

NITIN KUMAR SAXENAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Nitin Kumar Saxena filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 21458 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of U.P. and three others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner announced that he no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The respondent's Additional Government Advocate (AGA) raised no objection to this request. The Court, after noting the petitioner's intention and the lack of opposition, ordered the writ petition to be dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the petition was closed without any substantive adjudication on the merits.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal miscellaneous writ petition may be dismissed upon the petitioner's voluntary withdrawal?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • dismissal
  • high court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                           CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21458 of 2026

                                    Nitin Kumar Saxena
                                                                                                   .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)              :   Babita Saxena, Kuldeep Johri
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)              :   G.A.

                                    Court No. - 47
                                                       HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
                                                       HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State and
                                    perused the record.

                                    2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a
                                    statement at the Bar that he does not intend to further press this petition and
                                    seeks to withdraw it.

                                    3. Learned AGA has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

                                    4. In view of the above statement, the instant writ petition is dismissed as
                                    withdrawn.

                                    September 30, 2026
                                    KU
                                                                       (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.